Beyond Reproduction: Semiotic Perspectives On Musical Performance

Authors

  • Nicholas Cook University of Cambridge (Cambridge)

Keywords:

performance, semiosis, reproduction, reference, creativity

Abstract

The traditional musicological conception of performance is as the reproduction of pre-existing texts. This makes no allowance for the extent to which meaning emerges from the act of performance, and from the interactions between the various participants in performance events. A broadly semiotic approach focusses attention on such issues, and in this article I illustrate such an approach in terms of the communicative function of the mazurka ‘script’ and the role of performance gesture in conditioning musical meaning. I argue that, instead of thinking in terms of the reproduction of works, it is better to borrow Jeff Pressing’s term and think in terms of performances referencing scores, traditions, and other pre-existing entities: this way it is possible to conceptualise performances that range from the Werktreue ideology or tribute bands to parody or burlesque. Discourses of the relationship between works and performances are mirrored by those between performances and recordings, and consideration of the latter helps to clarify features shared by both: creativity, collaboration, and semiosis.

References

Clarke, E. (1995) “Expression in Performance: Generativity, Perception and Semiosis”, In J.

Rink (ed.) The Practice of Performance: Studies in Musical Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–54.

Clarke, E. (2005) Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cook, N. (1992) “The Conductor and the Theorist: Furtwängler, Schenker, and the First Movement of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony”, In J. Rink (ed.) The Practice of Performance: Studies in Musical Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105–125.

Cook, N. (2004) “Making Music Together, or Improvisation and Its Others”, The Source: Challenging Jazz Criticism 1: 5–25.

Cook, N. (2009) “Squaring the Circle: Phrase Arching in Recordings of Chopin’s Mazurkas”, Musica Humana 1: 5–28.

Juslin, P. (2001) “Communicating Emotion in Music Performance: A Review and Theoretical Framework”, In P. Juslin and J. Sloboda (eds.) Music and Emotion: Theory and Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 309–337.

Lacasse, S. (2000) “Intertextuality and Hypertextuality in Recorded Popular Music”, In M. Talbot (ed.) The Musical Work: Reality or Invention?, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 35–58.

Langer, S. (1957) Philosophy in a New Key, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Philip, R. (1992) Early Recordings and Musical Style: Changing Tastes in Instrumental Performance, 1900-1950, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pressing, J. (1988) “Improvisation: Methods and Models”, In J. Sloboda (ed.) Generative Processes in Music: The Psychology of Performance, Improvisation, and Composition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 129–178.

Todd, N. (1985) “A Model of Expressive Timing in Tonal Music”, Music Perception 3: 33–57.

Todd, N. (1992) “The Dynamics of Dynamics: A Model of Musical Expression”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 3540–3550.

Downloads

Published

26.11.2024

How to Cite

“Beyond Reproduction: Semiotic Perspectives On Musical Performance”. 2024. MUZIKOLOGIJA-MUSICOLOGY, no. 16 (November): 15-30. https://muzikologija-musicology.com/index.php/MM/article/view/326.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.