Ideology, Humanness, and Value. On Adorno’s Stravinsky
Keywords:
Theodor W. Adorno, Igor Stravinsky, Helmuth Plessner, philosophical anthropology, musical valueAbstract
Theodor W. Adorno’s critique of Igor Stravinsky has itself been repeatedly criticised. Following the same line, the present article takes as its point of departure the philosophical anthropology of Helmuth Plessner, which challenges the premises of Marxist anthropology, on which Adorno based his critique of Stravinsky. Far from regressing to the inhuman and primitive, Stravinsky’s music affirms, in historically adequate modern terms, the constitutive reflectivity of the human embodied condition, thus becoming more “human”, i.e. meaningful and expressive, than Adorno could have even conceived. Additionally, an account is provided of some groundbreaking musical qualities that underpin the artistic value of Stravinsky’s music, which Adorno also contested.
References
Adorno, Theodor W. 1973. Negative Dialectics, translated by E.B. Ashton. London & New York: Routledge.
Adorno, Theodor W. 1998. “Stravinsky: A Dialectical Portrait”. In Quasi una fantasia, translated by Rodney Livingstone, 145–175. London & New York: Verso.
Adorno, Theodor W. 2002. Aesthetic Theory, translated by R. Hullot-Kentor. London & New York: Continuum.
Adorno, Theodor W. 2006. Philosophy of New Music, translated by R. Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Adorno, Theodor W. 2019. Notes to Literature, translated by S. Weber Nicholsen. New York: Columbia University Press.
Banes, Sally. 1998. Dancing Women: Female Bodies on Stage. London: Routledge.
Clayton, Martin. 2000. Time in Indian Music. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cone, Edward T. 1962. “Stravinsky: The Progress of a Method”. Perspectives of New Music 1 (1): 18–26
Deliège, Célestin, and Michaël Lamb. 1988. “Stravinsky ↔ Language”. Perspectives of New Music 26 (1): 82–106.
Dworschak, Thomas. 2021. “Der unmissverständliche Sinn der Musik. Ein Versuch mit Plessner und Adorno”. In Perspektiven der Musikphilosophie, edited by W. Fuhrmann and C.-S. Mahnkopf, 120–149. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1975. Aesthetics. Lectures on Fine Art, vol. 2, translated by T.M. Knox. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment, translated by P. Guyer & E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kielian-Gilbert, Marianne. 1987. “The Rhythms of Form: Correspondence and Analogy in Stravinsky’s Designs”. Music Theory Spectrum 9: 52–66.
Kramer, Lawrence. 1978. “Moment Form in Twentieth Century Music”. The Musical Quarterly 64 (2): 177–194.
Marković, Mihailo. 1991. “Human Nature”. In A Dictionary of Marxist Thought, second edition, edited by Tom Bottomore, 243–246. Oxford & Malden: Blackwell.
Marsch, James L. 1983. “Adorno's Critique of Stravinsky.” New German Critique 28: 147–169.
O’Conor, Brian. 2013. Adorno. London & New York: Routledge.
Paddison, Max. 2003. “Stravinsky as Devil: Adorno’s Three Critiques”. In The Cambridge Companion to Stravinsky, edited by Jonathan Cross, 192–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plessner, Helmuth. 2003. “Zur Anthropologie der Musik”. In Ausdruck und menschliche Natur. Gesammelte Schriften VII., edited by Günther Dux, Odo Marquard and Elisabeth Ströker, 184–200. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Plessner, Helmuth. 2019. Levels of Organic Life and the Human. An Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology, translated by Millay Hyatt. New York: Fordham University Press.
Rechberger, Herman. 2008. The Rhythm in African Music. Helsinki: Fennica Gehrman.
Rogers, Lynne. 1992. “Dissociation in Stravinsky's Russian and Neoclassical Music”. International Journal of Musicology 1: 201–228.
Stevenson, Leslie, and David L. Haberman. 1998. Ten Theories of Human Nature, third edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tsetsos, Markos. 2020. “Die Kunst des tönenden Verhaltens. Helmuth Plessners Beitrag zur Musikästhetik und Musikanthropologie”. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 51 (2): 145–164.
Tsetsos, Markos. 2021. “Why Still Bother with Beethoven? Myth, Reason, and Value”. In Ludwig van Beethoven. 150(+1) Years since his Birth, edited by Ioannis Fulias, Katerina Levidou and Iakovos Steinhauer, 150–160. Athens: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
van den Toorn, Pieter C. 2004. “Stravinsky, Adorno, and the Art of Displacement”. The Musical Quarterly 87 (3): 468–509.
van Eecke, Livine. “Adorno’s Listening to Stravinsky – Towards a Deconstruction of Objectivism”. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 45 (2): 243–260.
Williams, B. M. 1973. “Time and Structure of Stravinsky's Symphony in C”. The Musical Quarterly 59 (3): 355–369.
Wilson, Ross. 2007. Theodor Adorno. London & New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 MUZIKOLOGIJA-MUSICOLOGY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Ауторство — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. -
Некомерцијално — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
